Self Defence
ORC 2901.05 and 2901.09 — what the state has to prove
Two changes in recent years reshaped this entirely, and both went the same direction. One moved the burden of proof. The other removed the duty to retreat. Anything written about Ohio self defence before 2019 describes a different rule.
There is no duty to retreat before using force anywhere you lawfully have a right to be. The statute goes further than removing the duty: it tells the trier of fact not to consider the possibility of retreat at all when weighing whether the force was reasonably believed to be necessary.
- The rule reaches self defence, defence of another, and defence of a residence.
- It applies anywhere you are lawfully present, not only at home.
- Being somewhere unlawfully takes you outside it.
- Removing the duty to retreat does not remove the requirement that the belief in the need for force was reasonable.
Separately there is a presumption. Where the person that force was used against was unlawfully entering, or had unlawfully entered, the residence or the occupied vehicle of the person using it, self defence is presumed. That presumption does not apply where the other person had a right to be there or lived there, or where the person using force was themselves there unlawfully.
Stand your ground came in through Senate Bill 175, effective April 2021. The burden shift came earlier, through House Bill 228, in 2019. Both are now in the sections cited above.
Sources for this section (2)
- ORC 2901.05 — Burden of proof, and the self defence presumption
- ORC 2901.09 — No duty to retreat where you lawfully are
Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Talk to a licensed Ohio attorney about your situation.