Skip to contentSkip to Search and the menu

The OVI Stop

ORC 4511.19 — roadside, before anyone is arrested

An OVI stop has stages, and the rules are different at each one. Getting pulled over, being asked to step out, being asked to perform roadside tests, and being arrested and asked for a chemical test are four separate moments with four separate answers.

  • ORC 4511.19
  • ORC 4511.191
  • Terry v. Ohio
Email

Who handles this in Ohio: Ohio State Bar Association lawyer referral; and legal aid programs and the state offices, listed in the Ohio directory.

Four moments, four different answers
  1. 1The stop

    Pull over

    The officer needs
    Reasonable suspicion of a violation, which any actual traffic offense supplies.
    You owe
    A prompt, safe stop. License, registration, and proof of insurance.
  2. 2Step out

    Not optional

    The officer needs
    Nothing more than the lawful stop itself.
    You owe
    Getting out when told. Passengers too.
  3. 3Roadside tests

    No separate offense for declining

    The officer needs
    Your cooperation. These are evidence gathering, not a legal duty.
    You owe
    Nothing. Ohio has no statute making refusal of these its own crime.
  4. 4Chemical test after arrest

    Refusal has its own cost

    The officer needs
    A lawful OVI arrest first. Blood normally needs a warrant on top.
    You owe
    This is the one implied consent reaches. Refusing starts a suspension immediately.
  • ORC 4511.19
  • ORC 4511.191
  • Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  • Birchfield v. North Dakota
  • Stepping out of the car is not optional. An officer may order the driver out of a lawfully stopped vehicle without any additional suspicion.
  • The passengers may be ordered out on the same footing.
  • Roadside field sobriety tests are a different thing entirely. They are evidence gathering, and Ohio has no statute making refusal of them a separate crime.
  • The small handheld breath device at the roadside is not the evidential machine, and it is not what the implied consent statute is about.
  • The chemical test after arrest is the one implied consent reaches, and refusing it has its own consequences.
  • Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  • Maryland v. Wilson
  • ORC 4511.19
  • ORC 4511.191

Refusing roadside tests is not the same as refusing the chemical test. They are two different decisions at two different moments. Declining the walk and turn does not trigger the license suspension. Declining the breath, blood, or urine test after a lawful OVI arrest does, and that suspension starts immediately.

  • ORC 4511.191
  • ORC 4511.192

Blood is treated differently from breath. A breath test may be taken as a search incident to a lawful arrest, but drawing blood is more intrusive and normally needs a warrant or a real emergency. The fact that alcohol leaves the blood over time is not by itself the emergency.

  • Birchfield v. North Dakota
  • Missouri v. McNeely
  • U.S. Const. amend. IV
Words some people use here. Nothing requires them.
“I am not refusing to cooperate. I am declining the roadside tests. Am I free to go, or am I being detained.”
  • Terry v. Ohio
  • ORC 4511.19

The car never has to move. Having physical control of a vehicle while under the influence is a separate first degree misdemeanor, and it asks only whether somebody was in the driver's position in possession of the ignition key or other ignition device. No operation is required, which is why the offense exists as its own section rather than as a lesser version of OVI. A court may impose a license suspension on it.

  • ORC 4511.194
  • ORC 4511.19

You do not have to be over the limit to be charged. The impaired driving offense and the fixed number offense are separate ways to prove the same section.

  • ORC 4511.19
Sources for this section (10)
  1. ORC 4511.19 — Operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs (OVI)
  2. ORC 4511.191 — Implied consent to chemical tests
  3. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — Investigative stops require reasonable suspicion
  4. Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977) — An officer may order the driver out of a lawfully stopped car
  5. Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. 438 (2016) — A breath test may be taken incident to arrest, a blood draw needs a warrant
  6. Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) — An officer may order passengers out of a lawfully stopped car
  7. ORC 4511.192 — Advice given at an OVI arrest, and the administrative suspension
  8. Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013) — The natural fall of blood alcohol is not by itself an emergency justifying a warrantless draw
  9. U.S. Const. amend. IV — Searches and seizures
  10. ORC 4511.194 — Having physical control of a vehicle while under the influence

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Ohio attorney.

From here

Walked through

This section is the long version of a step in one walkthrough. Each one takes the same law one decision at a time, with both sides of the moment written out.