Skip to contentSkip to Search and the menu

When You Cannot Pay

ORC 2947.14 — a hearing before anyone goes to jail over a fine

A fine and a jail term for not paying one are different things, and the second cannot happen simply because the first went unpaid. Ohio requires a hearing, and the question at that hearing is narrower than people expect: not whether the money arrived, but whether the person could pay and refused.

  • ORC 2947.14
  • Bearden v. Georgia
Email

Who handles this in Ohio: Ohio State Bar Association lawyer referral; and legal aid programs and the state offices, listed in the Ohio directory.

  • A court may order commitment until a fine is paid only where it determines at a hearing that the offender is able to pay and refuses to do so.
  • That hearing is to be conducted at the time of sentencing rather than at some later point when the money has not appeared.
  • At it, the offender has the right to be represented by counsel, to testify, and to present evidence about ability to pay.
  • ORC 2947.14

A finding that somebody can pay has to be shown, not asserted. Where a court determines an offender is able to pay, the statute requires the determination to be supported by findings of fact indicating income, assets and debts as presented by the offender, and the ability to pay. A conclusion with nothing under it is not what the section describes.

  • ORC 2947.14

Already in custody over it is not the end of the question. An offender held in custody for nonpayment is entitled to a hearing on the first regularly scheduled court day following the arrest, to inform the court of any change of circumstances affecting the ability to pay. Circumstances change, and the statute assumes they will.

  • ORC 2947.14

The constitutional floor underneath the Ohio section says the same thing in fewer words. A court cannot imprison somebody for failing to pay without determining that the failure was willful, because punishing a person for being unable to pay is punishing them for being poor rather than for anything they did.

  • Bearden v. Georgia
  • ORC 2947.14
Words some people use here. Nothing requires them.
“I am not refusing to pay. I am not able to pay, and I would like the hearing on ability to pay.”
  • ORC 2947.14
  • Bearden v. Georgia

This section is about incarceration for nonpayment. It does not describe how a fine is set, what other consequences an unpaid balance carries, or what any particular court offers instead, all of which vary. A licensed Ohio attorney is who reads a specific judgment entry.

  • ORC 2947.14
  • ORC 2929.18
Sources for this section (3)
  1. ORC 2947.14 — Hearing on ability to pay a fine
  2. Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983) — A court may not imprison for nonpayment without determining the failure to pay was willful
  3. ORC 2929.18 — Financial sanctions for felonies

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Ohio attorney.

From here

Walked through

This section is the long version of a step in one walkthrough. Each one takes the same law one decision at a time, with both sides of the moment written out.