When You Cannot Pay
ORC 2947.14 — a hearing before anyone goes to jail over a fine
A fine and a jail term for not paying one are different things, and the second cannot happen simply because the first went unpaid. Ohio requires a hearing, and the question at that hearing is narrower than people expect: not whether the money arrived, but whether the person could pay and refused.
- A court may order commitment until a fine is paid only where it determines at a hearing that the offender is able to pay and refuses to do so.
- That hearing is to be conducted at the time of sentencing rather than at some later point when the money has not appeared.
- At it, the offender has the right to be represented by counsel, to testify, and to present evidence about ability to pay.
The constitutional floor underneath the Ohio section says the same thing in fewer words. A court cannot imprison somebody for failing to pay without determining that the failure was wilful, because punishing a person for being unable to pay is punishing them for being poor rather than for anything they did.
“I am not refusing to pay. I am not able to pay, and I would like the hearing on ability to pay.”
This section is about incarceration for nonpayment. It does not describe how a fine is set, what other consequences an unpaid balance carries, or what any particular court offers instead, all of which vary. A licensed Ohio attorney is who reads a specific judgment entry.
Sources for this section (3)
- ORC 2947.14 — Hearing on ability to pay a fine
- Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660 (1983) — A court may not imprison for nonpayment without determining the failure to pay was wilful
- ORC 2929.18 — Financial sanctions for felonies
Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Talk to a licensed Ohio attorney about your situation.