Skip to contentSkip to Search and the menu

A Recorded Interrogation

ORC 2933.81 — when the recording is required, and when it is not

Ohio requires an electronic recording of a custodial interrogation held at a place of detention for certain serious offenses. It is a duty on the agency rather than a right somebody asks for, and it does not reach every interview.

Email

Who handles this in Ohio: Ohio State Bar Association lawyer referral; and legal aid programs and the state offices, listed in the Ohio directory.

  • The duty attaches to a custodial interrogation at a place of detention, which leaves roadside and doorstep questioning outside it.
  • It is limited to the offenses the statute lists rather than applying to any investigation.
  • A statement is not automatically excluded because the recording requirement was not met.
  • ORC 2933.81

A missing recording is an argument, not an outcome. The statute creates the obligation without making a failure to record a rule that throws the statement out. What the absence of a recording does is give a defendant something to raise about the reliability of what is said to have been said, which is a different thing from suppression.

  • ORC 2933.81

Whether an interrogation was custodial at all is decided by the same test that decides whether warnings were required, and an ordinary traffic stop is not custody for that purpose. Where a recording does exist, it is a record held by a public office and the public records section covers how one is asked for.

  • ORC 2933.81
  • Berkemer v. McCarty
  • ORC 149.43

Recording a conversation you are part of is governed by a different statute entirely, and the Recording section sets out Ohio's one party consent rule. This page is about what an agency must do, not about what anybody in the room may do.

  • ORC 2933.81
  • ORC 2933.52
Sources for this section (4)
  1. ORC 2933.81 — Electronic recording of a custodial interrogation
  2. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984) — A routine traffic stop is not custody for Miranda purposes
  3. ORC 149.43 — Availability of public records, including law enforcement video
  4. ORC 2933.52 — Interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Ohio attorney.

From here

Walked through

This section is the long version of a step in one walkthrough. Each one takes the same law one decision at a time, with both sides of the moment written out.