At a stop, the sections this page reads say, in short:
- Every licensee has the license in immediate possession while driving, and displays it on a peace officer's demand. Not doing so is a petty offense.
- A driver detained for a suspected violation provides evidence of financial responsibility if the officer asks, as a secondary action.
- For a petty offense in the officer's presence, the officer may detain the person only as long as it takes to issue a complaint and summons, and that detention is not an arrest.
The Fourth Amendment sets limits on every stop, and the Supreme Court of the United States has drawn several of them. It has held that a stop is reasonable where the officer has probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, whatever the officer's actual motive; that an officer making a lawful stop may order the driver, and the passengers, out of the vehicle; that a passenger is seized by the stop and may challenge it; and that a stop may last no longer than its purpose requires, so it may not be extended for a dog sniff without separate reasonable suspicion. It has also held that consent to a search has to be voluntary, judged on all the circumstances, and that the prosecution does not have to prove the person knew they could refuse. Those holdings are a floor: a state's own constitution and statutes can give more protection than they do, never less.
A search of the vehicle has rules of its own. Whether a particular stop was lawful is a question for a licensed South Dakota attorney.
Sources for this section (9)
- SDCL § 32-12-39 — Requirement that license be in possession of driver; Display of license; Violation as petty offense
- SDCL § 32-35-114 — Evidence of financial responsibility when detained for a suspected violation
- SDCL § 23-1A-7 — Detention of violator to issue complaint and summons; Not an arrest; Summons or arrest for other public offense
- Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) — A traffic stop is reasonable when there is probable cause of a traffic violation
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977) — An officer may order the driver out of a lawfully stopped car
- Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) — An officer may order passengers out of a lawfully stopped car
- Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007) — A passenger is seized by a traffic stop and may challenge it
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) — A stop may not be extended beyond its purpose to run a dog sniff
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973) — Consent to a search must be voluntary
Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of October 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed South Dakota attorney.