Skip to content

Being Arrested

W. Va. Code § 62-1-5 — before a magistrate without unnecessary delay, and a citation in place of arrest

  • A person arrested is taken without unnecessary delay before a magistrate of the county where the arrest is made.
  • For a misdemeanor not involving injury, committed in the officer's presence, the officer may issue a citation instead of arresting, if the person will likely appear.
  • The magistrate tells the person the nature of the complaint, the right to counsel, and that no statement is required.
  • W. Va. Code § 62-1-5
  • W. Va. Code § 62-1-5a
  • W. Va. Code § 62-1-6
Email

The person is given reasonable means to reach a lawyer or a relative to obtain counsel or arrange bail, and is not jailed or moved from the county before having a reasonable opportunity to do so.

  • W. Va. Code § 62-1-6

Several rules about an arrest come from the Supreme Court of the United States rather than from this state's code. It has held that before questioning a person in custody, officers must warn that the person may remain silent, that anything said can be used against them, and that they have a right to a lawyer, appointed if they cannot afford one; that a person arrested without a warrant is entitled to a prompt decision by a judge on whether there was probable cause; and that officers generally need a warrant to search the data on a phone taken from a person they arrested. Those holdings are a floor: a state's own constitution and statutes can give more protection than they do, never less.

  • Miranda v. Arizona
  • County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
  • Riley v. California

Whether a particular arrest was lawful is a question for a licensed West Virginia attorney.

Sources for this section (6)
  1. W. Va. Code § 62-1-5 — Delivery of prisoner before magistrate
  2. W. Va. Code § 62-1-5a — Citation in lieu of arrest; failure to appear
  3. W. Va. Code § 62-1-6 — Informing defendant of nature of complaint and his rights
  4. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) — Right to remain silent and to counsel during custodial interrogation
  5. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991) — Probable cause review generally within 48 hours of a warrantless arrest
  6. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014) — Police need a warrant to search a phone seized during an arrest

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of October 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed West Virginia attorney.

From here