Skip to content

Traffic Stops

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-489 and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-3,167 — the license on demand, proof of insurance, and ten days to produce it

At a stop, the sections this page reads say, in short:

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-489
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-387.01
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-3,167
  • The operator's license is carried at all times while driving, and presented for examination on an officer's demand.
  • An officer demanding a license first displays proper evidence of lawful authority.
  • Evidence of insurance may be shown as an electronic image on a phone, without consenting to a look at anything else on it.
  • An owner who cannot produce proof of insurance has ten days to show the prosecutor it was in force, and the citation is then dismissed.
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-489
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-387.01
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-3,167
Email

The Fourth Amendment sets limits on every stop, and the Supreme Court of the United States has drawn several of them. It has held that a stop is reasonable where the officer has probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, whatever the officer's actual motive; that an officer making a lawful stop may order the driver, and the passengers, out of the vehicle; that a passenger is seized by the stop and may challenge it; and that a stop may last no longer than its purpose requires, so it may not be extended for a dog sniff without separate reasonable suspicion. It has also held that consent to a search has to be voluntary, judged on all the circumstances, and that the prosecution does not have to prove the person knew they could refuse. Those holdings are a floor: a state's own constitution and statutes can give more protection than they do, never less.

  • Whren v. United States
  • Pennsylvania v. Mimms
  • Maryland v. Wilson
  • Brendlin v. California
  • Rodriguez v. United States
  • Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

Searches, frisks and arrests at a stop rest mostly on the cases rather than the statutes. Whether a particular stop was lawful is a question for a licensed Nebraska attorney.

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-489
Sources for this section (9)
  1. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-489 — Operator's license; duty to carry and exhibit; exception; officers; power to demand presentation
  2. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-387.01 — Evidence of insurance; display as electronic image
  3. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-3,167 — Financial responsibility; owner; requirements; prohibited acts; violation; penalty; dismissal of citation; when
  4. Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) — A traffic stop is reasonable when there is probable cause of a traffic violation
  5. Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977) — An officer may order the driver out of a lawfully stopped car
  6. Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) — An officer may order passengers out of a lawfully stopped car
  7. Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007) — A passenger is seized by a traffic stop and may challenge it
  8. Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) — A stop may not be extended beyond its purpose to run a dog sniff
  9. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973) — Consent to a search must be voluntary

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of October 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Nebraska attorney.

From here

Walked through

This section is the long version of a step in one walkthrough. Each one takes the same law one decision at a time, with both sides of the moment written out.