A driver has the license in immediate possession at all times when driving, and shows it for inspection on the demand of a peace officer or another authorized representative of the Department of Public Safety who identifies themselves as one.
- A person charged with not carrying the license is not convicted if they produce, in court or at the citing officer's office, a license issued to them before and valid at the time of the citation.
- Not carrying or showing the license is an infraction.
- The license may be physical or electronic.
A driver also has proof of liability insurance in immediate possession and presents it on demand. It may be shown on a mobile electronic device, and showing it that way is not consent for the officer to look at anything else on the device.
A conviction for not having or showing proof of insurance is an infraction with a mandatory fine of $500, unless the driver later produces, in court or at the citing officer's office, proof that was valid at the time of the citation.
The Fourth Amendment sets limits on every stop, and the Supreme Court of the United States has drawn several of them. It has held that a stop is reasonable where the officer has probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, whatever the officer's actual motive; that an officer making a lawful stop may order the driver, and the passengers, out of the vehicle; that a passenger is seized by the stop and may challenge it; and that a stop may last no longer than its purpose requires, so it may not be extended for a dog sniff without separate reasonable suspicion. It has also held that consent to a search has to be voluntary, judged on all the circumstances, and that the prosecution does not have to prove the person knew they could refuse. Those holdings are a floor: a state's own constitution and statutes can give more protection than they do, never less.
Sources for this section (9)
- AS 28.15.131 — License to be carried and exhibited on demand
- AS 28.22.019 — Proof of insurance to be exhibited on demand; penalty
- AS 28.15.011 — Drivers must be licensed
- Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) — A traffic stop is reasonable when there is probable cause of a traffic violation
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977) — An officer may order the driver out of a lawfully stopped car
- Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) — An officer may order passengers out of a lawfully stopped car
- Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007) — A passenger is seized by a traffic stop and may challenge it
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) — A stop may not be extended beyond its purpose to run a dog sniff
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973) — Consent to a search must be voluntary
Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of October 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Alaska attorney.