Skip to content

Assistance Dogs In Public

RCW 49.60.215 — service animals as a reasonable modification, and a fine for misrepresenting one

In Washington, it is an unfair practice for a place of public accommodation to discriminate against, overcharge, or refuse admission to a person because of the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability.

Email

A place of public accommodation makes reasonable modifications so a person with a disability who uses a dog guide or service animal can obtain its goods and services, and allowing the service animal's presence is a reasonable modification.

  • A place may require a service animal trainer to remove an animal in training that is not housebroken, or out of control without effective action.
  • A place may post signs that misrepresenting an animal as a service animal may result in a civil infraction of up to $500.
  • A place is not required to care for or supervise a service animal.

Behavior or actions constituting a risk to property or other persons can be grounds for refusal. The rules for miniature horses are in the section and are not reproduced here. Whether an animal qualifies is a question for a licensed Washington attorney.

Sources for this section (1)
  1. RCW 49.60.215 — Unfair practices of places of public resort, accommodation, assemblage, amusement

Legal information, not legal advice. Verified as of September 2026. Applying it to a particular situation is the work of a licensed Washington attorney.

From here